From the LA TImes…

Tearing the anterior cruciate ligament — better known as the ACL — sometimes results in early surgery, sometimes in later surgery and sometimes in no surgery. But which scenario has the best outcome? Two studies released this week seem to contradict each other. One study found that for children younger than 14 who needed ACL reconstruction, early surgery was better than delayed surgery. But for 18- to 35-year-olds, early surgery with rehabilitation was no better than rehab plus later surgery if it was needed.

 

 

This LA Times article looks at two recent studies about ACL injuries. The first deals with ACL injuries in children and the timing of surgery.  The second study referenced seeks to determine whether a reconstruction is necessary— and if so, when should the reconstruction be performed.  The author tries to drive comparisons that are not necessarily correct, or statistically valid.  They are trying to compare apples to oranges… but at least they’re putting the information out there.

 

As a lead in, this is one of the many reasons why I believe that physicians should be taking a very active role in social media.  These articles, primarily titled to draw eyeballs,  (not the LA Times article) were very actively *discussed* on Twitter and on Facebook.  I received a number of direct messages regarding the articles and 3 patients brought an article in to the office to discuss the findings and whether or not it was pertinent to their particular case.

But I digress…

The first paper mentioned focused on children and the timing of an ACL reconstruction… ACL injuries in children present themselves as a challenge because they have open growth plates.  These are areas in the bottom of the femur or thigh bone and on the top of the tibia or shin.  An ACL reconstruction will typically cross the growth plates (although some techniques don’t) and this poses a theoretical risk of injury to the growth plate, which can stunt the growth of the leg, or cause the leg to grow at an unusual angle if part of the growth plate fuses.   Children, unlike most adults with ACL injuries, simply can’t help but continue with what they believe to be their usual activities.  This may lead to instability episodes where the bones of the knee slide on one another.  These buckling, giving way or instability episodes can cause tears of the medial or lateral meniscus (the cartilage discs in the knee), or it can damage the articular cartilage on the ends of the bones themselves.  Because children will not curtail their activities, these associated injuries tend to increase with time from the initial injury which tore the ACL.   The study presented showed that a reconstruction of the ACL within 12 weeks of the injury was beneficial because it minimized the risk of developing associated injuries and there were few growth plate injuries.  There are unique considerations when performing an ACL reconstruction in children in order to minimize the risk of developing a growth plate issue, so parents should seek out a sports medicine professional with experience reconstructing ligaments in this population.

 

The second article referenced focused on adults.  The article questioned whether or not an ACL reconstruction was necessary in all cases when an MRI documented tear exists.   As I have discussed for years on my website, the indication for an ACL reconstruction is not merely the fact that a tear exists.  This study was further proof that this is true.  Many patients without instability, buckling or giving way after a course of rehabilitation can be managed non-operatively.  Patients involved in sports requiring significant cutting, pivoting, twisting, or rapid acceleration or deceleration may not be able to participate in these activities without an ACL and may want to consider an early reconstruction to minimize the risk of developing common associated injuries as outlined above.  That said, I have a few patients who are skiing or playing certain sports, with a brace, and without an ACL reconstruction and are quite pleased with their quality of life… and that’s what it boils down to.  You can change your knee to suit your lifestyle or change your lifestyle to suit your knee.  Some patients may choose not to ski twice a year in order to avoid surgery… that is their decision to make… I am simply a team member there to provide you with the information you need to make an informed decision…. the  key element of Participatory Medicine.

Just wanted to add a great Podcast from authors of a recent study out of Europe which revealed that patients treated either with early PT and early reconstruction of the ACL or  those who waited — considered their options — and then chose whether or not to have surgery essentially had the same results after following them for 2 years.

As with all posts where I discuss medical issues, my standard disclaimer applies.

 

Ping list